What is the relation between the morphology of a neuron and its function? Neurons mostly present large dendritic extensions, the exact role of which largely remains unknown. It could be, as has already been suggested, that dendrites are simply there to increase the membrane surface area of the neurons to enable the binding of 10- or 20 fold more synapses (Mel WB in [2] p421). This being the case, the shape of the dendritic tree and the particular position of the synapses would have only little influence on the computation performed by the neurons. The best model for approximating this dendritic function would be the point neuron. A: the arrival of an action potential at a synapse triggers an EPSP in the post-synaptic neuron. [6] Pages 75-76.

This function supposes an incoming firing time at t=0 of the presynaptic neuron. In this equation, u is the membrane potential of the dendrite and soma, *w* is the synaptic weight, *delta_ax* is the transmission delay between the time the pre-synaptic neuron is active and the time the synapse s becomes active. *t* is the time constant, *t_r* is the rising time constant and *H* is the Heaviside function.

One of the most obvious functions that the point neuron model can perform is coincidence detection: when two neurons are synchronized and both have the same point neuron as output, then the simultaneous arrival of the spikes triggers a summed EPSP that overshoots the spike threshold. This target point neuron then emits an action potential that indicates its coincidence detection. Thus, for a point neuron, the variation of the membrane potential depends exclusively on the synaptic weights and the arrival times of the incoming spikes.

What is less clear however is how this type of neuron, except when integrated in large networks, could detect many spike arrival times, i.e. a specific spike train. To investigate this, we modified the point neuron equation to incorporate a

propagation function along a dendrite.